In March, Microsoft said it would use its Bing technology to predict the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. On February 1, Microsoft said that Donald Trump would win the first four primaries by an even wider amount than before.
Microsoft’s Bing predicts that Trump will win the Republican primaries in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada relatively easily, topping Ted Cruz in all four states. Hillary Clinton is expected to win three out of the first four Democratic primaries—Iowa, South Carolina, and Nevada—losing New Hampshire to Bernie Sanders.
Microsoft said it used data from polls, prediction markets, and anonymized and aggregated search-engine queries to predict its results—some of the methods that it’s used to predict the outcomes of everything from “American Idol” to the World Cup. It isn’t always right: Bing never predicted the Denver Broncos to play the New England Patriots in the NFL playoffs, let alone beat the New England Patriots—Bing’s erroneous pick to win the Super Bowl.
Why this matters: Microsoft routinely shows off Bing’s skills by mining Internet data for predictions on sports and entertainment, politics, and more. The Super Bowl, however, is a sporting event, retaining an element of unpredictability. Award shows are where Microsoft can sink its hooks deep into social sentiment and fish out winners: It correctly called the 2015 Academy Awards, for instance. Elections, where poll follows poll follows poll, are another wealth of data that Microsoft can tap. Microsoft correctly called the “No” vote on the referendum for Scotland to secede from Great Britain, and also accurately predicted the outcome of more than 95 percent of the 2014 U.S. midterm elections.
How the numbers break down
As it has in the past, Microsoft will post the results on its Bing Elections site, where it tracks the candidates, upcoming events, its predictions, and the issues. Bing’s site breaks down each candidate by their position on the issues, how the candidate has fared on Twitter or Bing by number of queries, and, finally, provides a general biographical overview complete with funding numbers.
Microsoft said that its live predictions will be showcased beginning on Feb. 1. But Microsoft released its primary predictions today, as outlined in a blog post. And they’re not set in stone; they will, obviously, fluctuate, over time. However, are Bing’s first predictions (with all percentages supplied by Bing):
Update Feb. 1: Microsoft’s Bing has adjusted its estimated totals for the Iowa caucus, predicting that Hillary Clinton will win an estimated 53 percent of the delegates, while Donald Trump will win 44 percent of the delegates.
In New Hampshire, Sanders is now expected to win a 63 percent share of the vote, while Trump should win 53 percent. In South Carolina, Clinton is expected to win 68 percent of the vote, and Trump 49 percent. In Nevada, Bing predicts Clinton to win 63 percent of the vote, and Trump 46 percent.
The original Jan. 26 predictions are below.
Iowa (Feb. 1)
|Hillary Clinton||50.1%||Donald Trump||39.8%|
|Bernie Sanders||46.8%||Ted Cruz||30.5%|
|Martin O’Malley||3.1%||Marco Rubio||12.9%|
New Hampshire (Feb. 9)
|Bernie Sanders||58.4%||Donald Trump||40.2%|
|Hillary Clinton||40.5%||Ted Cruz||13.1%|
|Martin O’Malley||1.1%||Marco Rubio||12.6%|
South Carolina (Feb. 20, 27)
|Hillary Clinton||63.5%||Donald Trump||44.3%|
|Bernie Sanders||36.4%||Ted Cruz||22.6%|
|Martin O’Malley||0.1%||Marco Rubio||14.7%|
Nevada (Feb. 20, 23)
|Hillary Clinton||91.2%||Donald Trump||39.6%|
|Bernie Sanders||8.7%||Ted Cruz||20.8%|
|Martin O’Malley||0.1%||Ben Carson||18.4%|
Editor’s Note: This story was updated at on Feb. 1 to show adjusted shares of the vote, as estimated by Bing. [